Midget T30
1.2x Upscale using Quest T30 tubing
 Midget
Family

Having built a diffrerent scale of Midget using several of various sizes of Estes tubes, I decided to built one using some Quest T-30 tube I had scavenged from an unbuilt  kit.

This makes it a 1.2x upscale of the original K-40 kit, and just a tad smaller than a BT-55 upscale.  In the case of this rocket, I was very exacting on the scale and used Totally Tubular's T.908" tubing (Centuri ST-8) for the booster.  Custom centering rings from BMS hold the 18 mm motor tubes in both stages.  The nosecone was turned from scrap yellow construction lumber.

The motivation for this rocket is the decertification of the Estes A10-0T booster motor which propels at least five of my two-stage rockets.  The standard sized Midget (K-40) cannot possibly accomodate the longer motors without serious uglification.

The idea was to have a version of the Midget that could use standard sized (18x70mm) motors (which are in certification and eligible for use at club launches) but retain the compact look of the Midget.

The Quest T30 tube provides just that - an upscale that is difficult to tell apart from the original K-40 without a side-by-side comparison.

 

And the 1.2X upscale gives an extra inch of sustainer airframe, just perfect for the extra inch of sustainer motor.

Keeping the booster in scale was a challenge, but was accomplished by letting the  motor hang out the back.  It is retained with a hook.



Download plans for this rocket:

    o   Directions and patterns, pdf 
    o   Patterns in tif format (in case the pdf doesn't want to print right)

 



The rocket has been a regular flier for me, and has had numerous successful flights.  But on one occasion, disaster struck when the sustainer didn't light.  The result was a land dart that accordioned the forward airframe.





Here are a couple shots of the rocket right after the wreck.  It swallowed part of the nosecone and creased the tube almost all the way down to the fins.


Repairing Wrecked Rockets

Replacing the Front End after a Lawn Dart

The wreck occurred at the DARS launch in McGregor, Texas on Father's Day, June 19, 2005,  Of 12 flights that weekend, 11 were quite successful, which in this hobby is outstanding.  (Hey, if there's no chance of wrecking, there's no thrill of success 

After a good boost on a B6-0, the C6-7 sustainer never did light, and  the rocket lawndarted near the creek.  As I approached and saw it in the bare dirt, I momentarily had hopes that the dirt might be soft, that the rocket might have escaped damage.

But it wasn't to be.  As described above, the nosecone had been partially swallowed, and the airframe accordioned.  My first thought was that, if I could find a suitable coupler, the fin can might be salvageable.  Otherwise, I'd be putting a whole new rocket under the nosecone.

While I didn't have a T30 coupler per sé, a spent 29mm single use Aerotech motor, with a couple wraps of tape, fits perfectly in the Quest T30 tubes. 

After leaving the rocket on the bench a few weeks, I finally took a closer look to see what might be salvaged.  The nosecone, being made of hard pine, had only minor damage and could be easily repaired with sanding and filler.

There were multiple issues with the airframe.  It needed to be cut off at the lower end of the accordion wrinkle.  However, the forward motor mount centering ring was not far below that point, and ideally, there needs to be ~1 caliber of coupler below the joint (and another caliber above).  This helps ensure that the replacement tube lines up perfectly with the original.

Another consideration was the launch lug.  If the cut line could be kept even with or just forward of the lug, then that would not need to be replaced.



 

There was only a little over 1" of good (unwrinkled) airframe forward of the motor mount, but I cut it off farther forward, at the end of the lug.  The idea was that any remaining wrinkles could be filled and that the coupler would more than compensate for any loss of strength due to the filled wrinkle.

The two previously broken fins were removed and replaced.  For the coupler, I sawed the ends off a spent Aerotech F23 and sanded its insides to remove all the residue.  A new forward tube was scavenged from my small stash of Quest parts.  I wasn't too concerned with getting it exactly the right length.  In fact, I was thinking that making the rocket a tad longer than scale might come in handy if another incident befalls it.

After applying a couple wraps of masking tape, the coupler and replacement aiframe were epoxied in place.  One really nice feature of epoxy is that it doesn't set real fast.  You have time to work things around and get the tubes perfectly aligned.



I set the rocket aside and returned to it a few days later.  With my dremel, I grinded down the seam and removed enough material so that once the area was filled, it would be flush; there would be no hump at the seam.

A piece of aircraft tissue paper was cut to cover the seam.  Regular strength Elmer's Fill-n-Finish was used to begin filling the seam.  Thinned FNF was applied to the tissue.  That in turn was applied over the seam and coated with more thinned FNF.  Basically, this method is a miniaturized version of tape-and-bedding drywall.  But instead of drywall mud and tape, I use FNF, tissue and thinned FNF.

After the seam treatment, I filled the fin roots and around the launch lug with FNF.  A wet finger works great to shape the FNF and minimize the amount of sanding needed later.




 

Click for hi-res
Just as with drywall, filled seams will eventually show through the finish if you don't tape them, and the tissue prevents that.

Looking down the tube, the coupler is visible.  The wet look around the coupler is due to the epoxy.  The wet appearance of the tube opening is caused by CA.  A few drops were applied and spread around with a Q-tip, then sanded smooth.  This prevents the opening from getting "fuzzy" due to the repeated insertions and extractions of the nosecone.  Plus it helps protect the tube against dings.
 

Click for hi-res







The repaired rocket turned out great.  It's a bit heavy, but still flies great on B and C motors.

Interestingly enough, on its maiden flight after the repair, it came down in a tree.  I managed to hook a line around the branch and pulled it down.  Unfortunately, the branch came down with the rocket and landed on it, breaking a fin

This time, I simply glued it back together - without any sanding/filling/painting - and have had numerous successful flights since.



Doug's Rockets Homepage

December 23, 2008